|
Written by Marty
|
|
Friday, 15 May 2009 14:14 |
|
Our forum is filled with BR management advice, below included. You should however be using some kind of bankroll management software to keep track of not only how much you have but where it is most wisely put to use. Phaedrus75 in the forum says: Still, I do think it is a little above a $400 BR. You should be playing MTTs with a roll up to an absolute MINIMUM of 50 buy-ins (personally I think 100 buy-ins is more appropriate). The 50 Buy-in figure is used by those who can afford to go broke and reload. Once you get a roll that will be devastating to lose, then BR management shifts to what is called management of a "protected" roll. The protected roll guidelines are roughly double those posted by Sun137 in the BR Section. |
|
Read more: Bankroll software and Re-buys [Bankroll software and Re-buys]
|
|
Written by Marty
|
|
Friday, 08 May 2009 16:21 |
|
Tournament Indicator and Holdem Indicator have added new visual options that allow users to change the view of their poker calculator from the familiar horizontal layout to a just-introduced vertical display. All the Iindicator products have always had a mini-view option, and last year they added flexible resizing that matches Poker Stars and Full Tilts table resizing features. |
|
Read more: Poker software adds vertical view features [Poker software adds vertical view features]
|
|
|
Written by Marty
|
|
Wednesday, 08 April 2009 18:39 |
|
Some of the online databases are getting whacked by PokerStars once again, this time having to do with limiting the information available to track random players in large field sit and go tournaments. As it is now, the stats may only be available if you have actually participated in the tournament. This will also effect (distort) many players performance percentages if winning from these tournaments are not included. |
|
Read more: Poker Stars limits database tracking for sng`s [Poker Stars limits database tracking for sng`s]
|
|
Written by Marty
|
|
Wednesday, 01 April 2009 17:26 |
|
Some time ago it was announced that a new version of PokerOffice was to be released, which certainly was nice to hear. I’ve been beta testing for a while, and today I saw that the version was finally released publicly, so I thought I’d write a few lines of my thoughts so far. There are a couple of improvements I’m the most happy about: |
|
Read more: Poker Office and Software comparisons [Poker Office and Software comparisons]
|
|
|
Written by Marty
|
|
Wednesday, 01 April 2009 03:59 |
|
Recently, the popular tracking databases online have expanded their reach, where their focus of the types of poker tournaments they track have overlapped and created more direct competition between each of them. Sharkscope, official poker rankings, and the pokerDB come to mind as those services that have taken on radical changes over last year. |
|
Read more: Sharkscope is on Tilt too much. [Sharkscope is on Tilt too much.]
|
|
Written by Marty
|
|
Saturday, 28 March 2009 13:36 |
|
I was curious what all hand grouping schemes people used to rank and sort their hole cards and decide what to play. Please pick whichever of the following items you find the most relevant or use the most personally. I'm interested primarily in NL Holdem tournament and ring play. |
|
Read more: Hand ranking system in poker software [Hand ranking system in poker software]
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 5 of 11 |