Recently, the popular tracking databases online have expanded their reach, where their focus of the types of poker tournaments they track have overlapped and created more direct competition between each of them. Sharkscope, official poker rankings, and the pokerDB come to mind as those services that have taken on radical changes over last year.
Sharkscope is still charging for their services, which have always been focused on sit and go activity, but do offer 5 free searchers per day from any IP address. Recently they have expanded their search to multi-tables sit and go tournaments, which include relatively large field, and the very popular, 180 seat tournaments at poker stars and full tilt. There are also very popular sit and go tournaments that range from 27 seats to 90 seats.
It used to be that if a player lost three or four sit and go tournaments in a row, then he might likely not be feeling too good about what has happened recently, and is continuing to play at a less than optimum state of mind. This is particularly true for the lower limits, where players are far less likely to have any understanding of the variance and luck of the game. That was then.
This is now. Even though sharkscope has added the multi-table tournaments, they have not adjusted the form indicator to take into account the larger field sit and go tournaments. Just because they are sit and go tournaments, doesn't mean performance in them should be rated the same as single table sit and go tournaments. Here's my point - if you do not cash in five consecutive sit and go tournaments sharks go is going to indicate that you are on tilt. One more loss, and it'll be super tilt.
In reality, that could be exactly how you are playing too - with tilt on the brain. However, what if you fail to cash in five or six consecutive 180 seat multi-table tournaments in a row? Does that mean you're on tilt or super tilt? Of course not. Tournament players know that in big fields, it can be five, 10, 20, even 30 tournaments before cashing in. You can take a look at some of the best players online, and these prolonged streaks are so common, they are an accepted part of the game.
Those are also the guys that know the mass of tournament poker. Sometimes there's several small caches, and then every once in awhile, there is a big win, and that makes tournament poker profitable. The rounders in poker tournaments usually have absolutely no dilemma about not caching for long streaks. I'm intentionally ignoring the argument here, if someone is actually playing bad, because it isn't relevant to the reality of streaks in MTT's.
I really don't know if the folks over at shark scope understand this about tournament poker, but for that form indicator to have any relevance from here on, either you have to filter the results as a paid member, or completely ignore it because it isn't relevant anymore.
Recently, some poker software operators have offered different levels of ID changing for it's online player database. Such as feature allows for two major implications in the game. By changing... Read more
Since Tournament Indicator poker software added the replayer feature I have started using it more and more to not only analyze my own play, but to analyze the situation from... Read more
What looks to be a complete overhaul of Holdem Manager, HM2 is now in BETA available by application. The release was announced on the Holdem Manager blog along with a video showing hi-lights of... Read more
A new HotKeys program has been released called TableDroid. At present the v1.0 is only available for Party Poker. The product has launched with a very professional looking website and... Read more
QMCalculator
This is a free poker calculator that measures your tournament M and Q.
MZone Strategy Videos
These free videos show you how to use poker calculators in online tournaments.
Sit and Go Certified
A comprehensive guide to using a poker calculator to profile your opponents.
TheBackhander
An online poker calculator that simulates hand strength on all hold'em streets.
Poker Networks
Understanding the poker software industry and the "Network" Business model.
One of the best poker software features released of late from PokerStars - at least to me - is the ability to show one card when folding yourself, or getting... Read more
Online poker hasn't really been around for too long, maybe a decade or so, but as soon as it was, clever programmers were thinking about designing poker tools that could not only produce a winning edge for a player, but stretch the meaning of fair play.
Well the best poker software tools have survived an era of audacious claims made by many fly-by-nighters. Poker software like Poker Tracker, Holdem Manager and Tournament Indicator have achieved real staying and power market share largely due to following the rules set out by online poker rooms such as Full Tilt Poker and Poker Stars, yet they have displayed evidence of creating clear advantages for those who use the tracking software. From the Poker software blog.
Comments